New Beginning
Almost exactly one year to the day after I started this blog something quite unusual happened. It crashed. Well, to put it more honestly, my website, of which this sometimes rambling, sometimes raving, occasionally poetic but more often cryptic record of my life is a part, crashed. It went belly-up, suddenly, without warning, without even a hint of a future history which would, as I’ve now realized in that cliché way we’ve all come to know as hindsight, prove to be a defining moment in my self-created blogging universe.
That may not sound very unusual: this precarious universe built on infinitesimally small packets of information, tiny little bricks piled haphazardly one on top of the other; this shanty supercity where we flaunt the fundamental rules of structural design, this
Or so I thought. So I imagined. So I feared. So I despaired.
But, in the end, the catastrophe that drove me to 2 weeks of raki-induced oblivion was itself a mirage. My digital self hadn’t, in fact, shattered into a billion bits and bytes. It still existed, cryogenically frozen somewhere in the infinite chill of deep cyberspace. Nonetheless, for those 14 days, I was lost. During that time, I hunted, like Gilgamesh hunting Enkidu, like Rumi roaming the warren of streets in
What did I discover? you must be asking. Let me tell you a story.
The day before Saladin entered triumphant into
That image stalked Saladin, even as he negotiated the terms of surrender with the envoys of Balian of Ibelin, the defeated Frankish ruler of
The next morning, at the moment when the gates of
Saladin, this Saladin, the Saladin who mounted his milk-white mare on the morning of the 27th Rajab 583, was in fact no conqueror at all. This man, who rode at the forefront of the most feared army in the whole of the
In the first entry I ever posted on this blog, I wrote:
This…is my journey through war...and peace...and all of the myriad details that make life so dizzyingly spectacular. But it's not a journal. I don't know what it is yet but I'm interested in seeing what it will become.
That interest has turned to fascination which in turn has inspired enquiry. Losing the blog forced me to reconsider the question I asked when I started: What is a blog? What had I lost and could it ever be regained?
That line of thinking led me to reconsider my ideas about identity, a theme I’ve been exploring for years (something all immigrants must face at some point in their lives). For many years, I’d tied identity to history, not simply my own history in the concrete sense of a life led, but in the more abstract sense of history existing as an ontological entity where a collection of pasts inform and shape the present. In that sense, I’d toyed for some time with the idea of borrowed histories, a theme Hermann Hesse explored so beautifully in Demian. My identity, my logic went, is not simply the sum total of my life but the calculus of the lives that have come before me; my parents for example: their history has shaped my identity, just as the histories of their parents shaped theirs; my friends, whose histories have become an integral part of my own self-awareness; the collective history of Canada; of Pakistan; and now of Turkey. All of these histories are linked in me, like a matrix, like the dendrites of a neuron, which naturally leads to the next question: What is the soma? What is the central body of this self? Searching for that centre created a conflict in me that I found difficult to resolve, as the following excerpt from another previous entry shows:
I am Pakistani-Canadian, and there is the crux of the problem. I am a Muslim-atheist-apostate, an extension of the problem. I am also a secular-spiritualist, a writer-photographer, a friend-lover, a pacifist-war junkie. We are not unique, people like us, folks caught in the hyphen. In fact, it’s not too much of a stretch to say that the whole of humanity is a vast collection of conflicted individuals, fragmented personalities stitched together by well-placed punctuation, an army of grammatical Frankensteins searching for continuity.
It haunted me, this conflict, this elusive continuity that seemed to exist always somewhere in the penumbra, never fully exposing itself to the light. And the more I searched for it, the more distant and abstract it became.
Until I lost my blog.
That seemingly catastrophic event was, I now know, a blessing in disguise. It forced me to accept that my identity is not singular, that losing one history – the history I’d constructed in cyberspace, for example – was to lose one self in the myriad of selves that exist in us. The single neuron then becomes a network of neurons, a network of selves linked by multiple histories.
Then it dawned on me, the answer I’d been dancing around for months:
If histories are the source of identity, then the more histories in which we implicate ourselves, the more selves we create.
Rather than a cause of imprisonment, the hyphen is in fact a liberator. It frees us from the illusion of singularity, a point I made in another blog entry:
So maybe in some ways being multiple is better than the certainty of any single identity. That certainty is too easily corrupted into a form of racist nationalism. Multiple identities may be confusing but they provide us with the empathy and necessary displacement required to appreciate the value of other cultures.
Not only other cultures, but the value of our own other selves. To take that thought a step further, single identities don’t exist, they are a false construct, like God, the product of fear, a fear of the unknown, a fear of the Other. Single identities, like God, become an object of worship, a source of dogma, and inevitably a source of conflict. Applied to current events, the wars we see around the world today are not a Clash of Civilizations but rather a Clash of Identities. As the world shrinks, as histories mix and new identities challenge the old, established ones, societies in general and the people who specifically make up those societies will naturally struggle against what they perceive as a loss of identity.
So the challenge in the world today is to find a way to overcome the dogma of singularity, in a sense to create a space where multiple identities are accepted as the natural state of being. It will be a long and difficult road: to challenge the religion of the singular self is to challenge the power structures that derive legitimacy from that religion, those who reinforce the illusion of dominant cultures and superior modes of thought. That will be a challenge I’m now willing to take up on this blog, now that I finally realize, after losing it, what it means to me.
This then, is the new beginning…

2 Comments:
adnan, i hope you have a backup somewhere. i hope your writings do exist somewhere on the internet, even if in a cryptic form [i can decrypt it, i'm taking crypto this spring].
i hope all those words are not lost forever. losing things makes me very, very, very sad.
But so what, welcome to blogspot, hope you feel at home here *hug*
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home