Setting the Record Straight
Mistakes happen, I suppose. But it’s always a little frustrating for me when a journalist makes such monumental ones. The National Post ran a story on the “murder” of 26 villagers in Panjwayi by the Taliban whose headless bodies were then strung up in various locations for days. A macabre image indeed but also completely wrong. My sources went to verify the story and came back with this:
A NATO informant was found by the Taliban living in Tulkan Bazar, a small village not far from where Canadian troops are building a road in southern Afghanistan. Under interrogation, he identified 7 other informants in the area. Six of those were captured, one escaped. Two of those captured later managed a getaway. The remaining five were “convicted” of spying in a Taliban Shari’a court and executed, in the traditional Taliban way - beheading. One body was strung up in the village, for less than a day, as a warning to any others thinking about spying for the enemy.
Gruesome, but nothing close to the scale of the Post story. My understanding is that the reporter wrote the piece based on a single phone call from an Afghan police officer. There was apparently no attempt at follow-up or verification. Nor, apparently, any serious logical thought put in before writing what is obviously a sensationalist story. If you have any understanding of the Taliban, you would be very suspicious of an informant reporting such a grizzly scene. First off, how could Taliban fighters prance around the area dragging along more than 2 dozen bodies and then string every one of them up in trees without being noticed by Afghan or ISAF forces? Tulkan village is in an area where there is a strong NATO and Afghan presence. Why would the Taliban be stupid enough to string up that many bodies, risking being discovered, when one would be enough to get the message across to the local people? And to let them hang for days, preventing villagers from burying the dead – this is totally un-Islamic. The Taliban, remember, are Islamic zealots.
I don’t want to completely trash a colleague, even if he does work for the National Post – a publication with about as much credibility as Fox News. I know how much pressure there is on reporters to get a scoop and how frustrating it can be to work in the information vacuum of a military embed. But there was obviously no consideration for truth in the making of this story and a journalist’s primary loyalty is to the truth, not the voracious appetites of his editors for sensational stories. The Post has been guilty of this in the past and they will likely be guilty of it again in the future. That’s their problem. But then again, it’s also our problem, a problem for the entire media industry. This is why the public is losing trust in us and why what is simply bad reporting needs to be exposed.
****PLEASE GO TO THIS POST FOR AN UPDATE****

7 Comments:
????????????????
Anonymous: Sounds like a BIG question. Too bad I don't know what the question is...
I dont know the question too,I wish to know but..Sometimes answers is more important than questios.
Do answers exist without questions?
Always not exist; but there can be some exceptional positions;like having many questions to ask but feeling its a big mistake to ask sth.. the feeling like couldnt do anything..
Sorry about unnecessary question marks..
Adnan, you really fucked this up, mate.
Error #1: My source was not an Afghan police officer.
I am curious how you came to this: "...the reporter wrote the piece based on a single phone call from an Afghan police officer."
In fact, my source was an Afghan working in and around Talukan for the Canadian military. I met him face to face, at Mas'um Ghar. For obvious reasons I could not identify him by name.
The day after my story ran, a senior Canadian military officer said, in morning orders to other officers, that "we have received an intelligence report indicating that 26 people have been hanged in Talukan."
Error #2: You write that "There was apparently no attempt at follow-up or verification."
In fact, I did seek verification and this was noted in my story.
Obviously there has been no denial that 26 Afghans were murdered in Talukan by the Taliban on the date in question. To the contrary, the incident is noted in a Canadian intelligence report and was mentioned in orders to Canadian officers.
Finally, you write this: "But there was obviously no consideration for truth in the making of this story and a journalist’s primary loyalty is to the truth."
Wrong again. And hypocritical.
Adnan, you seem like an interesting guy and you are a nice writer, but you rush to judgement and you commit mistakes you attribute to others.
You received inaccurate information and chose to publish it (and disparage me and my newspaper) without verifying or following up, the very things you say--again inaccurately--that I did not bother with.
Please amend your blog entry.
Adnan, you really fucked this up, mate.
Error #1: My source was not an Afghan police officer.
I am curious how you came to this: "...the reporter wrote the piece based on a single phone call from an Afghan police officer."
In fact, my source was an Afghan working in and around Talukan for the Canadian military. I met him face to face, at Mas'um Ghar. For obvious reasons I could not identify him by name.
The day after my story ran, a senior Canadian military officer said, in morning orders to other officers, that "we have received an intelligence report indicating that 26 people have been hanged in Talukan."
Error #2: You write that "There was apparently no attempt at follow-up or verification."
In fact, I did seek verification and this was noted in my story.
Obviously there has been no denial that 26 Afghans were murdered in Talukan by the Taliban on the date in question. To the contrary, the incident is noted in a Canadian intelligence report and was mentioned in orders to Canadian officers.
Finally, you write this: "But there was obviously no consideration for truth in the making of this story and a journalist’s primary loyalty is to the truth."
Wrong again. And hypocritical.
Adnan, you seem like an interesting guy and you are a nice writer, but you rush to judgement and you commit mistakes you attribute to others.
You received inaccurate information and chose to publish it (and disparage me and my newspaper) without verifying or following up, the very things you say--again inaccurately--that I did not bother with.
Please amend your blog entry.
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home